General Forum

n/a

u might b right...pass on the cards LoL

who are you

In support of my fav's response, I will now reveal the secret of the CC Valentine :D

(C)lever
(C)uties

(V)ery
(A)ctively
(L)ooking to
(E)ngage
(N)aive
(T)argets
(I)n
(N)umerous
(E)xpenditures

$-)

Ummm...did I spell all those right? ;))

you spolied the surprise..not only a card but one of your famous 121 sesswions.i already have the puppy & the matches :--)),but it is only sexual remember,no romantic valentines stuff...oh wtf you're so sexy imnotsoshy,please be my valentine!! hug & kiss big boy!

n/a

n/a

n/a

I want to send a card to my favorite host - but she is being awkward at the moment Perhaps if she considered what i asked her to do !! That could be her present to me !!!

changed my mind..dont want anything from anyone unless its a gun and a bullet with my name on :)

uhm wayne, YOU only get the bullet

You'll be getting love messages aplenty soon enough...

Tories, Labour, Lib Dems ........ etc etc

http://www.seatwave.com/andrea-bocelli-tickets/season/?affid=0100&gclid=CNLO5-zt258CFYGDzAodrjA2Hg

Do you need a date? I can bring flowers.

n/a

Hey L.
Have a nice time in Italy :-P

Its located in Lajatico which is between Florence and Pisa. The cheapest way would be to fly Bueair from Bucuresti to Florence and take train and bus from there. At the moment the round trip flight is less than 100 euros.

Thank you very much ''traveler '' ! :)

I forgot to add that he is blind. Would love to go with you hosty if you will sleep with me afterwatds. An evening of Bocelli's music in the warm Italian open air to raise the passions followed by a night of great love making to quench them. Sounds perfect to me.

How charming. A bald-faced offer. How can anyone resist?

The are tickets around but expect to pay a lot. at least 300 euros

300 euros? for someone i never heard of? who is she? LOL

He is one of the hottest opera singers around at the moment. Recently duested with Mary J Blige at the Grammy's singing "Bridge Over Troubled Waters" which is to raise money for the Haiti disaster fund.

just did a search.. correction... who is he?

omg wha tan amazing voice he has!!! just listened to the duet of Eros Ramazzotti and Andrea ...they sing 'Musika E' song , it lasts 9:45 mins - i can't get enough of their voices and the spitit of the song
God created so talented people)))

n/a

n/a

n/a

hosty i love ur style :)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

yeah....all my friends and family left...sob sob :(

Im still here for ya hun:*=))

awww ur too kind.....thx babe :* :))

n/a

im too shy to make new friends *BLUSHES*

n/a

If you let me spend the night with you I'll pretend I have it :P

n/a

lol It certainly sounds like you know how to take care of a man :D

It is a real condition -- in fact, it's estimated that as many as 1 out of 10 men might have it. It's also more common in men than in women. To date, studies show that 2/3 of reported or diagnosed cases have been men.

Sexsomnia is what is known an N-REM parasomnia. To explain what that means, I'll break it down into its two parts. N-REM means it is a "non-rapid eye movement" disorder, which means a person's eyelids don't move in an accelerated manner as it takes place. As an example, the direct opposite --- which most people are familiar with -- would be a true REM (rapid eye movement) condition such as dreaming, where your eyelids DO flutter in a rapid manner as you sleep and drift off into your dream state.

"Parasomnia" is simply a disorder that takes place either (1) while you are asleep OR (2) it happens in that transitional time between sleeping and when you start to wake up.

Some researchers believe Sexsomnia might be a true genetic disorder -- however, most scientists (to date) believe it is really an emotional issue, since those who either experience or suffer from it tend to overwhelmingly be people undergoing heavy bouts of stress, anger, fear, guilt and shame. As a result, the most common way that a doctor will treat Sexsomnia is to advise a person to seek counseling AND for them to alter much of their daily lifestyle, in order to drastically reduce or eliminate their stress, anger, fear, guilt of shame that they might be feeling at the time. Medication is also used, with anti-anxiety meds being the usual prescription.

I have been working in the sleep disorder field for almost 4 years now, and everything Bio teacher said is correct. I have researched it myself before reading this. But I would like to take it one step farther.

At this point, Sexomnia is NOT considered a true sleep disorder. However, I have information by doctors on the AASM (American Academy of Sleep Medicine) that the next time they will gather to offically diagnose some new sleep disorder conditions, Sexomnia is on top of the list. It should be later this year.

n/a

n/a

Impulsive men :-P

Well first I would make him believe I am enjoying it more than he does, just to keep it growing, and to have him feel completely relaxed and enthusiastic about it. Then I suddenly move away, making sure as many people as possible notice his "condition". I will most likely point and laugh, too. And other fun things... Fun for me.

usually i expect it,being the hotty i am,but the last time was embarrassing.i told my uncle it wasn't right,we're related

n/a

n/a

I was dancing with a girl, not at all good looking, when it happened. My pecker popped up... took a look at what i was dancing with and immediately ran back between my legs to hide!

If your pecker runs you should see your doctor

yep, you pegged that one right!!

John Terry has more ho's than Tiger...and they are his mates' wives..;)

Lmao)))))))))

I know what you wrote was a joke but the fuss that is made about this really annoys me. She was his ex-team mates ex-girlfriend. They had already split up before the affair with John Terry. It is not so unusual for a guy to go out with a friend's ex.

But he wasnt the only one she slept with, dunno why publicity puts shame only on Terry, there were 4 more team mates, if im not mistaken. He is married sure, but he cheated before lots too))But anyway, hope he still remains captain)

sure let him stay captain,then his team mates can spend the time worrying if he is jumpin their wives or gfs.great for morale leading into the world cup

Looool))))Everyone is sooooo saint right? The team mates shud spend time taking care of their wives so that they dont wanna jump on other men;) Besides, i dont think that they never cheated on their wives, they are footballers. Anyway, he is a leader, and a great player, thats all a captain needs. As for morals, as ive said noone is inoccent, he is a public person thats why everyone point their fingers at him, but they shud look at theirselves first. Dont judge and u wont be judged;)

i know it takes 2 to tango,but by doin; his teamate;s partners he shows them no respect.how can they show him respect as a leader then.with his lack of restraint,respect * morals where will he lead them?btw do you have an english football jersey,i can pretend to be mr terry.

Lol well...U seem to worry abt their wives more than they do. As Stevie G, Frank Lampard and Wayne Rooney support Terry))) He fucked a stupid french model, who isnt even nice looking, but it was never a secret that he loves women a lot)) If she opened her legs for him, doesnt mean that others will. And if they do-who needs a wife like this?

we're only s'posed to love 1 at a time & it's not the partners i care about it's team unity & harmony.if the player's have doubts about their leader,how can we lift the trophy?btw you didn't answer my question,lol

Answering ur question-if i like a player doesnt mean im wet for him.

And as ive said the main players of the team dont doubt him, they support him and still want him to be a captain. So if this is what u worry abt-dont;)

not exactly answering my my question,but you covered all bases.guess i better look elsewhere for my thrills

n/a

i not going to lower or up mine i think...dollr here is up.meanless members online ..also dollar is up-mean all in russia is more expensive..

don't forget, when the dollar is down, oil goes up.

and when your rate goes down, so do the pants...ha ha

lookin like a fool with your pants on the ground

Guys like the lowest price possible and want to be with a host that will do what they want, lol. Usually, that means strip, but that can be just being a nice host that can hold a good conversation and allow the member to have a nice time.

You would be better off determining what you feel comfortable doing and what type of host you want to be, and then picking the category that best fits you. Perhaps describe that to us and we can tell you. If you are not sure, start out as little shy. Little shy gives you the freedom to strip when you want and when you want to just chat. Glamour does the same, but many members avoid it since stripping is not common, especially in open, whereas in little shy, it happens quite a bit more in general.

CC has low prices in general in comparation with other sites
. And wtf !!! why you talk for others? ! ''Members like''. Maybe YOU like !

I think it is safe to say that the vast majority of guys here and every other site want to pay the lowest price possible. The exceptions would be money slaves and those that enjoy helping a host out from time to time so they are willing to pay more and even ask her to raise her price. But far more want to pay the lowest price. I don't see too many members here ever complain about prices being too low, for example.... In fact, I have NEVER seen it.

I also said they want to see a host do what they want. I didn't limit it to stripping. A guy might want a friendly conversation, as I indicated. I didn't further get into all the other possible situations such as he wants to be dominated, et cetera.

I made a general statement which I stand by, despite your remarks. The host asked a question that was way too broad and not well formulated so I responded with a general answer that applies most of the time and "lol". I then tried to solicit more information and gave her a more specific recommendation as best as I could given the limited information that she provided.

Your attitude in your post makes me think that perhaps you are a host that is angry about members complaining about prices. But I am sure that is not what happened here. :p

Yet some of the most popular hosts such as AxB, Chaneldoll, xxhottouchxx Chocotati are certainly not among those charging the lowest prices.

I know this doesn't make much sense, but it is just my opinion so it doesn't have too. I like the chase. I like thinking I might not get what I want and then getting it. I find that most often occurs in LIL SHY so I always start there. Mostly I like pretty women so I go where I can find them.

The catagories I generally dislike are INSTANT ACTION and FETISH.

n/a

General forum ..)))) ..and if thats not workin, then I usually browse the adult softcore area. Cuz you know, contrary to popular belief, some of us show up with clothes on, and like to chat a little. ))))

n/a

I would not go by what I read here. Members writing here have a lot of time on their hands. Not enough money to keep busy in video?

Great, so all that stuff on squirting pussies was a load of BS? ))

Did you ever consider that while some ppl smoke after sex, some like to participate in this site's forum? ))

And, what kind of impression are you trying to give this "nicehost" .... she will likely never come to this forum again.........I think you should apologize, and then leave. lol

I would agree that I at least have too much time on my hands, lol.... But does that include you too? :p

Yes, me too. ;)

Whatever the reasons, it's a tiny minority that post here.

I warn against making decisions based on such a small sample of a certain type of viewer.

n/a

I'll try to avoid "member" syndrome lol.

A good host can be found ANYWHERE. I sometimes find hosts who are intelligent and fun by reading the general forum, or from a host's personal profile. That's unusual I know. I do like to chat, I have more fun that way in the end... :P

But if I were to pick a category it would first be Little Shy (beautiful hosts who are willing, for the most part), then Glamour (beauty, a little less willing), then Not So Shy (more willing), then Instant Action (eager and willing).

And sometimes I end up in dungeon and fetish, and wonder if I am willing...

n/a

I need to figure out just who you are, and try out one of my multiple personalities :D

n/a

hot bath, candles, a little brandy maybe....oh and of course a favorite CC model in there with me..wink wink ;))

n/a

n/a

n/a

www.camtocam.com ??

Hope it helps.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

I think the only difference for you will be that in your chat you could mention Cam Contacts, and the member might not know what you are talking about.

I think this is also where restricted sessions come into play. There are sites that are marketed differently, and for whatever reason the sessions must follow different rules.

One more thing, I heard that some affiliate sites have a preview option so members can see teaser video before they start to pay.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Same as ever.... No difference (if in a nonrestricted session). You were always allowed to strip 100% at your option if the session was nonrestricted, both in open and 121. They are just trying to let everyone know nudity is allowed.

Given how they wrote the descriptions, I think the idea is that if a host is more willing to strip but is a bit shy in some way, then to pick little shy. If she is going to strip just every now and then, to pick Glamour. But the rules during a nonrestricted session are identical for Glamour and Little Shy. In fact, they are identical for every category except nonadult in terms of stripping being allowed. The only difference is when a host has the option and when she does not across the categories, but with little shy and glamour, the rules are not different... it is always the host's choice.

There may be a difference about when you can strip if the session is restricted, but a big warning will appear on your monitor so don't worry about it.

The bottom line is that Glamour works for CC so they decided to keep it. But in terms of your question, nothing has changed at all, at least for nonrestricted sessions. If you are popular, stick with one account.... If not as popular, maybe add a little shy session too although you will get more pressure to strip from members in little shy even though you don't have to. Members do seem to expect a bit more from little shy hosts even though the host has the option with both glamour and little shy.

(I should add that I haven't checked the rules yet and only category descriptions, but it would seem that the rules have not changed at all given how CC described the categories for all to see.)

n/a

When CC added 121, they told hosts as follows. I am not sure if it still appears anywhere, but I can tell you it was there until recently according to my host friends:

The most important changes are:

1) NO MORE ADULT activity in non-adult categories – including private One2One sessions !

2) New Category "Glamour Girls". Although still non-adult it does enable you to expose some of the glamour side of you without having to go to an adult category ;-)

Glamour, therefore, was NOT considered adult at first. In fact, the above clearly states it was considered NON-adult, as you can see.

The problem is the hosts were then told to look to the adult ratings for what is allowed, and Glamour was described as NOT being nonadult so it was confusing. I believe that they have corrected this in the category ratings page, but I haven't asked my host friends if the first part, where Glamour is said to be nonadult, still appears anywhere.

Anyway, it doesn't matter. As you said, if nonrestricted, hosts can strip 100%, and that includes Glamour. (Non-adult sessions are always restricted so this rule wouldn't apply to non-adult). The only issue is whether or not the host has an option to strip and that depends on the category.

n/a

Glamour was never considered non-adult by CC. When they started this category theysaid it was neither adult nor non-adult but was in between.

With all due respect, I quoted CC so I don't know how you can possibly say Glamour was never considered "non-adult". But you are correct in terms of what their intent was.... a bridge between adult and nondult.

This is the whole problem (or was the whole problem) with Glamour.... Not even CC understood it, lol

It is not correct to say "there never has been any restriction on what a Chat Host does in a video chat in any category, unless the session is restricted." The whole concept of restricted and non-restricted sessions was introduced about 3 years ago.

n/a

I was not aware as to when the idea of restricted sessions came about. But like I said, whether you want to believe me or not, CC specifically stated in black and white that glamour was non-adult. I quoted them, lol. That's the end of the argument, and their comments were there very, very recently. I am not sure if they are still there.

But the intent clearly was it to be a hybrid between adult and non-adult and let nonadult type of hosts tease and stuff. I really don't remember when Glamour hosts first started getting naked or were even allowed to do so.

Anyway, for all practical purposes it is now official: Glamour and Little Shy are essentially the same with nudity, although not required, allowed in both (at least for restricted sessions). Well actually it was official before, but now it is easier to point to something for those hosts confused by when a session is restricted.

NON-restricted sessions nudity is allowed..... meant to say (NON-restricted....)

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. I hate that nonrestricted versus restricted thing.....

You have taken one statement and show it out of context.
CC also said that all non-adult category shows are restricted but that not all glamour shows were restricted and glamour allowed activity that is not permitted in the three (at that time) non-adult categories. There were further explanations that made it clear that Glamour was between the non-adult and adult categories.

The context.....

(from the chathost resources page home page)

VERY IMPORTANT!!
Please be aware that it is no longer allowed to have adult related activity in non-adult One2One or private sessions. Read More...

(and when they clicked on the link, they would see....)


Important Message From CC
... what is it all about?


Dear Chathosts,

This is a VERY IMPORTANT message that you MUST read as it announces some big changes at CamContacts that affect YOU.

We have introduced "Adult Ratings" which replaces the previous "Adult Levels". It is a slightly new concept that enables us to provide RESTRICTED live video sessions to various Mobile phone operators and Hotels that meet their regulatory requirements and at the same time to restrict certain activity in some of the website Categories on CamContacts.

The most important changes are:

1) NO MORE ADULT activity in non-adult categories – including private One2One sessions !

2) New Category "Glamour Girls". Although still non-adult it does enable you to expose some of the glamour side of you without having to go to an adult category ;-)

3) RESTRICTED SESSIONS. Each time you receive a video session from a viewer from a RESTRICTED service you will be warned of what Adult Rating the video session is and what activity is not allowed.

4) You are only allowed to select certain site categories on CC (Make new friends, Little shy etc..) based on your Adult Rating that you choose.

5) The next time you start session you will be asked to select your Personal Adult Rating – so we know which Restricted Sessions we can send your way.


For full details of these changes please view the Chathost FAQs – Adult Rating Guidelines

We thank you for your patience and cooperation in working with us to make these new changes a success. It is really appreciated. We understand that it may take you a little while to get used to these changes and will therefore be tolerant over the forthcoming period for minor breaches. With these new changes we shall be launching new services over the next few months which will bring more customers to you. We will announce these new services once they start going live.

Again, many thanks for your support.

Love,

CamContacts team
XXX


(and all of that appeared until very recently.... I don't know if it is still there.... GLAMOUR WAS STATED BY CC TO BE NONADULT!!! Why are you resisting this? I didn't make this up!!! They might not have treated it like nonadult, but they said it was nonadult. Argue with them, not with me. But then on the restrictions page they said something like "for adult categories (and this includes Glamour)...". so they contradicted themselves. Now it is more clear since glamour is adult softcore.)

n/a

I am not sure when that language appeared since it looks like they revised that page if memory serves me correctly. I think before it said something like Adult (which includes Glamour...), like I said before and didn't have that language. Either way, at best, in one place they called glamour nonadult and the other, they are calling it adult, and that was my main point.

There were more than guidlines. There were rules and breaches of these earned a host penalty points.Hosts have never been allowed to strip in open video in the non-adult categories. There was agrey area regarding the extent to which sexy clothes and posing in open video was allowed. CC also said they would be "tolerant" about what host did in a private password session, and later in 121.

n/a

Little shy now says:
"In this category. You can expect something more than just chatting - a strip show, some soft core action, or more depending on how shy the Chathost is feeling!

I have had little shy girls tell me they do nothing sexual..just chat. That seems to be against what CC is saying here. I wonder if they will refund our money if this happens?

I would doubt it. I didn't notice the word "expect" until you pointed it out, but all she has to is do one little sexy thing like move her hand on the side of her face in a sexy way for 2 seconds and she's given you a show. There is a difference between a bad host and a host breaking the rules, after all, so the best you could probably do is give a low star rating and warn the rest of us.

I wrote them several emails before all this in hopes that they would make the categories more clear and make open versus 121 clear. I said said no nudity would be allowed in open or 121 for nonadult of course. Then, I suggested glamour and little shy be merged and have no nudity allowed open and nudity allowed in 121 at the host's option. For not so shy, I suggested having no nudity allowed in open but nudity mandatory at the member's option in 121. And for instant action, I had nudity mandatory at the member's option in both open and 121. This covers all the possibilities and gives the categories a clear distinction. But like I said, CC likes Glamour so it isn't going anywhere.

I guess they could keep glamour and have no nudity in open or 121 but sexy shows with at least bra and panties are allowed and have little shy the way i said (no nudity in open but nudity allowed at the host's option in 121).

This was what glamour was originally intended to be as I showed above. It was supposed to allow for nonadult hosts to be a little sexy to keep nonadult strictly nonadult.

That would leave...

nonadult: no nudity or sexy show in open or 121

glamour: no nudity in open or 121 but sexy show allowed in both (at host's option)

little shy: no nudity open but nudity allowed in 121 (at host's option)

not so shy: no nudity open but nudity mandatory in 121 if member wants

instant action: nudity mandatory in open and 121 if member wants.

Seems to make sense to me. Deals with the open versus 121 issue. Deals with when a member has a right to expect a host to strip and when it is the host's option. Generally deals with the issue of stalling and false promises although no system can be perfect for that. And makes a clear distinction between each of the major categories.

I wouldn't get into what a member can expect beyond nudity and say a little shy host needs to at least dance in open, for example. That leaves too much interpretation about what a "show" is. And I think if she is making members happy, that's all that ultimately matters. For better or for worse, the real issue most of the time is when a member has the right to see a host naked and when she has the right to say no, and my categories make everything clear as far as I can tell.

hosts do different things for different members depending on how she feels about him. your system would force her to change categories for him which is a clear signal to everyone watching that she is doing special things for someone else and not him. she needs to be able to do what she wants and stay where she is.

First, a host has no special right to stay in glamour and do what she wants. If the description and rules change, and these do not mesh with what she does, then she can switch categories. It is no different than when glamour was introduced and cc decided to make sure that there was no more adult behavior in nonadult. Things change and so must the hosts and the result was that hosts moved from nonadult to glamour in some cases.

Second, the host doing special things for some members could simply go to little shy on a permanent basis. She could then stay in one category where all those special things would be 121 and nobody else would know. I did agree with two other hosts that maybe glamour could be nudity in 121 at the hosts option but no playing and little shy could be nudity and playing in 121 at the hosts option, but even if a host played for certain members, she should could just stay in little shy on a permanent basis.

Thanks for the feedback. Even though I disagree, it is important to raise issues for CC to consider if they ever further redefine everything.

As you said, c.c. seems to like it the way it is, and so do I. You want everything to be so clear and eliminate the mystery of what a host will do for every member just based on where she is.

Just as you have so graciously offered to let hosts change where they go, you have the same option. At least one site lists explicitly what the host will do. Personally, I don't like that, so I stay at c.c.

Why the hell would you want to ban nudity in open.....if the hosts want to do it. Geesh....this is a sex site for crying out loud. Who might you offend?????

Not all hosts are happy for anyone to jump into their video and find them naked. Banning nudity in open video meets this requirement.

This point comes up time and time again. CC may be primarily a sex site but it is not exclusively so.

n/a

Full nudity in 121 for Glamour, full nudity in open for Lil-shy, using fingers and toys for Not so shy, what is the corner for Instant action? I think Glamour must be not allowed showing full nudity in 121 even.

both of your ideas are fine..... glamour as nudity but no playing and little shy playing but at the host's option..... the key is to make a definite distinction between the categories and that is all i was trying to do.... And if you're truly little shy, you would only want to play to be naked for 1 guy and only when you want to (and obviously with glamour too since even more shy) so my categories make sense at that level too.

Right now, there really is no difference between the categories, and even with not so shy, a host could force a guy to 121 for a real show. At best, a guy could hope she would get naked but she could just lay there. And it says "nudity", not "full nudity", is expected so she could just be topless.. It is way too vague.

I base my need for better defined categories on my experience and the numerous emails I've written them about how hosts act. But CC does very well so I imagine they feel if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

not so shy says full and explicit nudity is expected so a host couldn't just be topless.... of course a woman can be naked and posed in a certain way that she is basically showing nothing, but at least they said full nudity and the star ratings and viewer forum would hopefully take care of the rest

It is a sex site in large part, and for not so shy 121 and instant action both open and 121 you get that guaranteed under my proposal. With little shy 121 you might get it, which is what happens now anyway, and with glamour, if they kept it my way, you could at least hope for a tease of some type. Plus a glamour host could go to little shy for a show if she wanted. (I would avoid the password issue as a way around everything since that undermines the intetgrity of the categories.)

The key goal of mine is to get everyone on the same page without any type of misunderstandings. And most of the little shy hosts would probably give you nudity in 121 if you asked since they know u would probably leave if they didn't strip. Very few hosts here can truly do well by just being interesting and fun to chat with and stripping rarely. I even have little shy hosts strip in open or 121 before I even ask since they are so used to it, lol. Don't worry.... You will get to see what you want, but my way you will not ever feel ripped off unless a little shy host lied about giving you a show if you went 121. Unfortunately, there is no way to prevent that other than enough guys complaining about her to CC or if CC happened to be monitoring her at that moment.

n/a

Yours is a nice theory, but it does not work in practice. Profiles are incomplete. And hosts in free chat are intentionally vague because they know a wrong answer will keep a member from entering video. Your idea does not work in practice.

My idea is no more or less complicated than the current rules and makes things very clear. And for the host that wants to only perform for certain members and not others, little shy would be the perfect category under my system. "Glamour" is but a name.

The key is so that members and hosts know exactly what is allowed and exactly what to expect, and that is what I have attempted to accomplish. The current system, even as amended, does not do that and does things like essentially keep Glamour and Little Shy the same.

The problem with your ideas are the members. Whatever rules are set for each category some members will try to push hosts to break them and, sometimes, if the host refuses will rate her poorly. The other problem for CC in setting "maximum" limits for what is allowed in each category is how to enforce them. Few members would complain if a host goes beyond what is allowed in her category.

BTW while CC are revising things I bellieve that video is no longer a direct point to point connection between member and host. If this is correct maybe CC should change the wording on the enter video screen.

n/a

n/a

n/a

You miss the point. The categories are there for a reason. It is not about being a robot. First you read and understand the rules, then you pick a category, and then you comply with the rules there. That is exactly what you are supposed to do now. The problem is that the rules are not specific enough and lead to problems. Moreover, I challenge you to explain the difference between glamour and little shy.

If you want a site that lets the hosts do whatever they want in every category, that is fine with me. Just be prepared for a wave of members leaving. When someone is spending his money, he wants to know what he is getting, and that includes when he can expect nudity and whether it will be in open and 121.

Monique's idea does not work. It has been discussed in the forums before that hosts won't answer guy's questions about what type of show they give in free chat and most profiles are not very specific. I have tried her idea and so have others. The profiles never are specific enough and when you enter free chat to ask a host what she will do, she very often either gets offended or she will try not to answer and tell you she won't strip, for example, in the hope that the member will enter video anyway.

My idea eliminates much of the problems. It doesn't eliminate it for little shy, but in this category, the members willl all know that they are rolling the dice if they want nudity. In every other category, they know what to expect and when to expect it. It is perfectly clear.

There is still the issue of how long a host would have to strip when stripping is mandatory, so for not so shy 121 I would say within 5 minutes and instant action, I would simply say within the first 2 minutes or something like that. You need definite rules to avoid problems. There is also the issue of a little shy host or a not so shy host wanting multiple guys in her video where she was naked, but at that point, she isn't really shy at all and should really be in instant action. Most hosts prefer stripping for one guy, and if not, should be in instant action.

Also note one last think.... Most of the time, a host will only be stripping in 121 for more money. This is what hosts usually want!!! I am giving you what you want and eliminating much of the confusiion and game playing that goes on.

I am really getting fed up with the way you seem to think you know what all members want. I do not want a site where every category has rules that govern every detail. One of the reasons I have stayed with CC for a long time is it's relaxed and relatively free nature compared with other sites. I also believe that this flexibility is one reason why many hosts consider CC the best site even though they may also work on others at higher rates. There are many sites which operate in the way you propose. I suggest you stick to them.

I have read enough posts in the forums to see that the many agree with me in terms of the one issue I am focusing on .... nudity, It is primarily a sex site after all and guys want to know what they are paying for. They might not agree with my specific proposal but i guarantee they like knowing when a host will strip for them.

Perhaps u just like to chat and get the occasional show so u don't care about rules. But for those that like shows, they want to know when they have a right to expect one and get what they are paying for.

CC is great for both shows and chatting.... I am simply trying to accomodate both. The customer has the right to know what he is paying for. If u want to eliminate all categories and give hosts complete control to decide what they want to do, that is fine by mine. At least I will not have to worry hosts not understanding the rules since deception and manipulation will be allowed and I will have made a conscious decision to subject myself to it. Of course, many members would do just what you told me to do and leave.

CC agrees with my goals, NOT yours. That is why they have the categories and rules regarding nudity. I am just trying to make it work better. Profiles are not specific and hosts won't answer much of the time what to expect when you ask in free chat. And some use the flexibility that you love to manipulate members. Better defined categories help deal with this issue.

You basically like hosts being able to do what they want and give them the control. I give them that control too, but only in certain categories. If you want the site to be two categories, for example, such as Glamour (where hosts get to do what they want) and Instant Action (where members are in charge of what goes on), that's fine by me. Maybe we could agree on that.

n/a

n/a

i have to agree with real...who cares about the smell of a truck?oh yeah and my pants get shorter when i see a woman in leather.

guess you had to be there ><

n/a

n/a

n/a

21 December 2012. End of days man, end of days..

HEYYYYYYYYYY! Only snows in florida about every 20 yrs and it is the end of the world when my orabge juice doubles in price......lol

There was a partially successful campaign in UK to restrict weather forecasters predicting a fall of rain as though it were like some kind of disaster. "I'm really sorry but it looks as though it might rain today in the south east." So what? Without rain we die you idiot!

I can't imagine they do this in a country like Ethiopia where thousands of lives are at risk during severe droughts.

Unfortunately, TV weather forecasting in the UK is no longer scientific, just another part of show business.

Rain in the UK? Shocking!!!!! lol

I will add that she needs to have a flat head so that I have a place to rest the beer that she has brought me as she is "servicing" me. :))))

n/a

n/a

Nice list but you forgot one thing..... She must give me oral or she cannot be my dream woman, lol.

I'll settle for anyone that is still breathing:-))

n/a

n/a

n/a

That's fine. So long as you ladies understand that if you end up with me, it's MY money. After all, Porn Star, fair is fair...right? :)

n/a

You missed the whole POINT that I was making. Real Porn Star was making fun of men who want to be with a rich woman, so the woman can take care of them. Porn Star then said that was fine, so long as a man understood the money belongs TO the woman.

My point was simple -- fair is fair. If a woman who happened to become successful and has money wants to turn to a man & lover and say "You can be with me, but just remember that the money is MINE and I control it. It's NOT yours"...then why shouldn't the opposite be true? Why shouldn't a man who is successful and who has money be able to turn to a woman and say the same thing? Why shouldn't he be able to say "We can be together, but just remember the money is MINE?"

I happen to have money. Plus I come from a successful family and I'm going to inherit even more down the road. Literally a million or two. I don't mind marrying a woman and taking care of her and sharing things. But what I hate is a double standard. I hate that women expect to marry a successful man and immediately get half of the money and half of the house and half of everything...and yet if a man marries a woman with money, the woman gets to keep it all to herself and doesn't have to share. Like I said, fair is fair -- If you want it to be one way for the man, it should be the same way for the woman too.

As for only dating men from Russia, that's your business. Though it seems a bit mean-spirited to say, as if there are no good men from any other countries in the world, which would be silly to say. After all, how would you like it if I said the one country I WON'T date a woman from is Russia because there are NO good women there? I bet you wouldn't like that either. And I bet you'd stop and realize it's not true and there are good people ALL over the world.

n/a

n/a

n/a

already found mine

I had a gf like that once but she wanted sex all the time even during football on tv. She had to go.

i bet u are nothing like a dream man:P

The official striptease anthem:

'You can leave your hat on' by Joe Cocker

Yes, the classic. And "Something" by Joe cocker is also good.

Genesis : In the air tonight

There was a thread on this a while ago... I've always liked The Low Spark of HIgh Heeled Boys, by Traffic (Stevie Winwood as a young man).

Any good polka will do fine.

Lmao))))

Hess is more-Yess, Boss

Thank you Monika!

I take it u loved it;) Enjoy:*

n/a

Slayer - Angel of Death

EFF YEAH!!!

Fantastic!

n/a

n/a

yup ! :) California -Mylene Framer .

Wow !! The last on is just great ! Thank you , girls!

n/a

Martika - Love, thy will be done.

jimi hendrix-red house:)..not that i ever done it though..:)

I saw the Rocky Horror Show back when I was at uni. It as showing at a local theatre and I took along a Spanish friend of mine who had never even heard of it. I remember taking her to stand in the queue and watch as her eyes grew wider and wider as she saw men going past in leather Basques and women wearing very very short skits and wearing top hats, or dressed as chamber maids. I felt now was not the time to produce a set of latex gloves and an operating mask and gown covered in blood I happen to have with me ;)

That being said the atmosphere inside was awesome and absolutely every but everyone had a great time singing along dancing in the aisles and generally having a grand old knees up. After about 10 mins I soften my friend up enough to join in and she was quite quite wild.. taking her top off and running around in just her bra! Well everyone was doing it, male or female :P haha

It was quite a shock introduction to the whole Rocky Horror ethos but have to say even without knowing what she was getting herself into my friend went away a very happy young lady that night. I was pretty high myself too..

Ahhh good good memories.

TNTNAOAYTBOWAL

I'm just a sweet transvestite....from transexual transilvaniaaaaaaa.....yeah!!!
Well, I saw the Rocky Horror Picture Show on TV here in Germany for the very first time.
Actually, I did not plan to watch it. I stuck on the channel, when I was zapping. It
just had began and "Science Fiction Double Feature" was playing. Well, I loved it.
The songs, the characters....was really cool and funny. Here in Germany usually movies
are dubbed. But this movie not. Always when it comes on TV they show it with subtitles.
So this was my first RH-experience - btw. I was about 16 years old.
Some years later I saw a stage performance of a amateur theater group. They talked in
German and "sung" in English. Well, actually it was playback - but nice.
Again some years later I was about 19 and with my school class in Berlin. We watched
a professional stage performance. German speaking, English singing. The audience did
not act much.
And finally last year: I saw a professional stage performance in Munich. This one was really about
the RH cult. You could buy an equipment containing rice, a paper magazine, some toilette
paper, and so on. And there was an "HowTo" when to use each accessory. This performance was
completely in English and legen...wait for it....here it comes.....dery!!!! :-)

n/a

i'm not a host, but since this is for hosts and viewers in here, i'll take liberty and answer anyway. TRHPS is awesome. I saw it 30+ years ago when it was first out. The audience participation was a blast, popcorn flying everywhere, and I can't remember what else we did.

aficionados of the genre will note that it is THE ROCKY HORROR SHOW, when performed on stage and THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW, when it was made into a film.

n/a

The film you can pick up pretty much anywhere but for the show Alas.. it seems it is only touring the UK atm :( I can only see UK Tour dates mentioned. Do a search for Rocky Horror Show Tour 2010 with localised settings for your country and see if you hit anything. Else it will mean coming to the UK. Sorry.


TNT

hello dear... you might want to check out the book "New Rules of Lifting for Women" (if you google it you can find the website). I've been following the men's version of this for nearly a year now, and it's quite good. The men's program focuses on the most effective weight-lifting exercises in a routine that alternates between fewer reps, heavier weights, and more sets (for strength), and greater reps, less weights, and fewer sets (for muscle tone). You also get very good advice on nutrition.

I would say the nutrition advice is equally important, because your body will demand more protein and more fuel. Your body works hardest after you work out, to build muscle you've just broken down by lifting, and so you have to give it fuel. I usually have a whey protein shake (blended with frozen fruit) soon after working out. I haven't lost any weight since I've started (which I think i would like to do), but I haven't gained any either, which can easily happen I think.

I know how athletic you are :P You'll do great.

ohh hoodoo dear u r so nice:) always give so kind good posts. u r kind to everybody.such a sweetheart:)somtimes i think that u love even ur enemys:P

Hum...I don' think that in CC is anyone to be someone's else enemy . ;) Enemy is a big compliment for someone ( must be a person that is intelligent ,a redoubtable rival...) I don't offer this ''honor title'' to anyone ;))
Everyone use here anonymous ( or fake -why not ?) identities each time they can ,to attack each other or to be rude .
I personally don't mind that are here a few people that help ( even with a small advice ) every time they are able to. ....Do you?

Yea, but HooDooBoy is so cool and always good man. he help with everything i need. he is my hero and he is so cute and always charming. i like him more than anybody here. he always so smart and sweet. i always jump of happiness when i see him in my chat. kisses and love to you my HooDooBoy

If you love everybody, then the reality is that you love nobody. But it is a fantasy site so let him have his fun.

n/a

i not said nothing bad about hoodo btw:) just facts:P

No, nothing bad "ex yahoo buddy" (lol)... very nice of you actually. And thank you for the kind words, my friends...

Some viewers think I am too soft, or maybe a bit daft. I kiss too many asses (even if they are the prettiest on the planet). I melt when my sweet friend bats her eyes at me, rather than insist that the customer is always right, and I ought to know better. I am an easy target for those who consider themselves more sophisticated than me.

So there are those who simply don't like me. Oh well. Not important.

I prefer generally to be helpful and understanding in what I say here, and to accentuate the positive. There is certainly enough negativity and darkness to go around already, and I do recognize "truth" reflected in some of what is said in those dark places.

But my friends... I respect, admire, and love them (yes, if you like that word) as individuals, not as representatives of a class of people known as "hosts," or "everybody." I seek to know their characters, their minds, their qualities as people beyond what is merely skin deep. If they are mentioned in a public forum I will say what I know about them if I feel they are being wronged. So if that is what is called living (and loving lol) in fantasy I am guilty as charged.

Didn't you tell us a few months back that you were leaving CC, or at least no more video for you? How long did that last, lol?

Are you my biographer all of a sudden? I am flattered.

Sweety, let them think whatever. They are just jealous puppies. You are a kind person and I am glad that I met someone like you in c.c. You know you are always the BEST for me. I love our chats and the sweet words you always tell me. Kiss you my white knight.

Baby, you are a gentleman, sweet, and very good friend, other members which they were like you. At least you post with your own screen name and not like others that hide who they are. You are one of my very few favorite members from here.

n/a

It is the very fact that he uses his own screen name to post that keeps him in line. There is something to be said for using one's screen name, but not using one's name also allows everyone to truly say what they are thinking. It is no different than voting in secret for government elections.

You are also assuming he never posts under another name. How do you know what he does? His posts that contain his name may be but one part of his true personality. And he could have multiple screen names as well where he acts totally differently and simply never gives his cam.

Based on what I see in the forums and what I hear from hosts, he is generally a decent person and is respectful to hosts, at least when he acts as HooDooBoy. (I have no idea if he has other names.) Nevertheless, I have also heard a number of criticisms. None of the negative remarks are horrible or anything, but let's just leave it as his self-described butt kissing of every host here has annoyed a few hosts, not in terms of breaking their hearts or anything, but in terms of thinking that they truly were his friend and that he would be there for them.

Like I said before, when you love everyone, in many ways you love no one. You cannot be everyone's friend. It just doesn't work and you end up like a politician. But I certainly don't think he is a bad person. I simply don't think he is the saint a few hosts are trying to paint him out to be.

Congrats Hoo.... You are a star here. :-)

HooDooBoy has been my friend for long time and he has always been a great guy. Not everyone here is a bad guy. I am sure HooDooBoy will never come with another nick and act differently. He doesnt need it. Many, maybe most host are happy to have someone like HooDoo in their chat. I can say I enjoy my chats with him. He is sweet and friendly and always willing to help. What I like about him is not that he is not pushy, bossy, or rude. He knows how to treat a girl. He has a great character, very smart, and best of all is that he is very mature.

why cant someone be nice to everybody? i know Hoodob and i like he. anybody that meets him will like him cuz he is nice and good man. pls do not be so jealous. i give advice, pls be nice and maybe the girls will like u as much as we like Hoodoob

I feel I have to apologize to Avr0va, since this thread has nothing to do with her post.

And anyone else who is tired of reading about me, sorry. I'll stop now.

Member, your posts are well-reasoned and well-considered in general. You are skeptical, maybe too suspicious at times, but to good purpose usually I think; you question people's motives in light of their actions (or purported actions): and all this makes for interesting reading in the forums.

But you are taking me waaaaaaaay too seriously. My "... self-described butt kissing of every host here..." ???

In what dark corner did you leave your sense of humor?

HooDooBoy of course is an illusion, just as "member" is an illusion. Viewers are not to be taken at face value for what they claim to be. What host needs to be told this? My friends here certainly know this.

I do not claim to be beyond reproach, far from it. I disappoint some people, I know this, and I regret it for the most part. I don't want to be a star, and open my own room, be a "coverboy" lol; I just want to be myself, if there is such a thing (the whole idea of selfhood is problematic, but that's another thread).

HooDooBoy represents a better part of me, but is it untrue? I hope not. But here's the thing: I have gotten to know a number of hosts over time, obviously, and by now I think they probably know me better than I realize. There is something to a woman's intuition. I'm just happy I haven't been kicked to the curb. Yet.

less weight and more reps gives a more defining muscle

As long as you only think about, dream about or look at the other guy I don't really see a problem.

Of course it could be because you are worried about it that you dream about it.

First off, keep in mind that when we dream, the characters we see are often NOT who they are in reality, but personifications of:
1) Ourselves.
2) Someone else (see the resemblance between you "other guy" you dream of, and your partner).

Relax and analyze the dream, as well as the persons in it and their actions.
It can mean anything, like for instance, your desire for your partner to offer you something that only the other guy does/did.
As for why you dream of the other guy, it is all related to your history with him, but in general terms, you dream of him because you have the memory of him in your mind, and because he was important to you at some point. What that memory is all about, is for you to know.
Oh, as for dreaming? People dream every night, we simply don't remember all of our dreams, due to multiple and various reasons.

n/a

n/a

thanks for ur answers
im thinkinh maybe i didn t had closure with the other guy and that s why i keep thinking about him.For the record he was a guy i dated a few times and spoke online quite a long time but nothing happened ...or serious...or sex between us..and i know for sure it wouldn t work or he could never do the stuff my bf does or treat me like my bf does ...but im still thinking about him
damn it
yes lexi....what s ur prob???

n/a

n/a

Hello, Lexi...I am very sorry to hear that your ex is trying to chase you.My ex husband lives in US and he re-married a girl from Russia that I suggested him to marry.During divorce, my ex husband was still visting me, inviting me out...and it looked endless and I was very friendly because I cared for him.To date the Russian girl was my idea and first evening we have been out all three in a nice club to dance and to drink something.I had to tell him, whispering:"Do not take her home immediately, take her to eat a pizza , walk a bit, things like this"..He followed and they have a son now.You can try the same thing, after all, there are so many girls without any boyfriend.
I gained my freedom and we stayed friends 16 years after.
You can ccmail me. At my age, I know few things just from experience.Have faith, my dear.
Sincerely,
Beautyfruit

It's ok...you'll get over me soon! ;))

I take it you are from USA? From what I know to get this type of visa is going to be very difficult for her. When she has an interview at the consulate they will ask her to provide evidence that you know each other in real life to prove it's not another fictious marriage for a green card. Where's she from?

n/a

I thought so. The easiest way is that you come to Russia and marry her here, then take her back home with you as your family member. I have been told it's less difficult when you are married already.

Actually, until your post, I have ALWAYS heard that it is easier to get a fiancee visa than a visa to move to the USA after marriage. I know that seems to be the opposite of what it should be, but that has consistently been what people on CC and elsewhere say.

n/a

n/a

I know an american you can marry if you so choose to do that. :)

n/a

looking at his english I don't think he is from US.
But Master..Andrea is right. She has has to arrange the initial paperwork from the embassy in her country. I assume your country must have some kind of immigration site on the internet where you can find an answer to all your questions.

Actually, I think he must arrange the initial paperwork, mail it to her, she completes her part, and then she brings it to the embassy. I would even consider going with her to the embassy.

n/a

n/a

n/a

I've heard that it is a pain in the ass to get, but more in terms of the documentation than anything else. It isn't like a tourist visa where income matters. It is all about the legitimacy of the relationship.

Just have pics with yourself and your gf, pics with both of u and her family, records of phone calls, emails, and other things to prove the validity of the relatioinship. I don't think your income matters.... That just matters when you are sending a letter of invitation for someone to visit since the government wants to make sure the visitor won't be a burden on the country. A lawyer would be a good idea too.

Congratulations and good luck.

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

u want the visa, or you want to get it for her? if your lady is in Romania, and you in USA you don't need visa,at least not as of a year or so ago. however, if she is coming here, she needs a visa, and visas are hard to get for romanians, but ifyou are here to vouch for her it shouldn't be too hard to get. check with Immigration and Naturalization Service for requirements.

sorry, I should have read the other posts before replying.

n/a

The easiest way is actually to get her a student visa to a junior college near your home. You or her must show you have the financial resources to pay for tuition, room and board and other education and living expenses. She also has to pass the TOEFL test of English proficiency. Once she is here...you marry her. Then you file for a change in status. It works. I work at a university and it happens constantly. The trick is not to reveal a romantic relationship when applying for the student visa. You can offer room and board and living expenses though she must have funds sufficient to pay for the tuition. She will have to attend at least a semester of school befoer you marry so you dont appear to be circumventing the law. Plus an associates degree from a US college will help her get a job.
Good luck.

n/a

n/a

I think I will just marry a host and move to her country. Maybe I can get a job in the American embassy there or open a small store or something. Like "The Clash" said, "I'm so bored with the USA." Just look at CC and the hot women from Europe. Why come here? :p

When he registers, it will say....

How did you find us: Chathost
Promotion
Other

Then he picks chathost and it will say...

Chathost screenname:

And he enters your name.

If he has a problem, make sure he contacts CC BEFORE registering since it is too late once he registers to say you referred him.

It would seem to me that this feature would get used alot more if they would incorporate it in the same page as where you rate the model after your session......

You probably right.
And while we are talking about things being in the right place....Wouldn't it be good to see the video rates on the profile page instead of having to click through to them.

yesssssss....then we could see the rate even if they are offline.

I go in once in awhile....but most are empty, or have old posts.

As hosts can delete any posts from their "My Forum" page it imay not be that useful for gauging a host.

If a host can remove anything they want from the forum it is hardly worth having.

The star rating system is ok as far as it goes but does not give a fair overview of a host, a new host may not have any stars at all but be the best host here.

I know that there is always going to be a certain amount of subjectivity about comments, no two guests are the same and with good hosts no two visits are the same, but if more people left comments a good host would have more good ones than bad.

I think the vast majority of hosts do a very difficult job very well and I respect them all but it is a buyer's market and a clearer comment system would mean that guests would be more likely to use a host best suited to them therefore giving more satisfied (sorry about the pun) customers and fewer hosts being asked for services they do not like or provide. Everybody wins.

n/a

n/a

a third....LOL

:) i cry many times. When i am already veru sensitive about other things in my life and i go in bed with my hubby ,i also cry somethimes during love making . Are happy tears.

Try cutting out the onions on your kebabs?

Who knows the emotions of the fairer sex? From kitten to Tiger in 10 seconds ..... we just have to ride the wave.

Then again maybe you have one of those 'man orgasm faces' that would scare Conan The Barbarian! :)

Lol, yeah maybe the garlic too.

Did these women by chance just get out of another relationship? Maybe it was guilt.?

Now that I think about it more, you are probably right, sugarbear. thanks

n/a

MMM i bet i could make you cry with pleasure sexy..)))))

n/a

I had that happen to me once, she told me it was tears of joy.....but then again, she isnt with me anymore.......so......who knows......

i cried once during sex making when i remembered how good was my ex was in bed then realised i left him for someone not so good as him. sorry if this is the case with your girls.

n/a

I cried during sex too .... but I did after all go to a boarding school run by priests....

Well what did you expect? Wisdom?? :)