General Forum

yes :D one for treezers one for magnify glass.....can u?

damn my typin is gettin worse...tweezers*

lol - yopu arrened the war school of typing like mi

damn, I can almost understand that sentence ... and that scares the shit out of me!

n/a

n/a

Haha , feeling like cheating Mr. Right hand with Mr. Left hand or what? :)))
And yes, I can with both, but is not needed all the time :P

I think I am going to need to see some proof that you can use both hands ...

lord, please find a way to let "that wud be tellin" masterbate without feeling guilty. Amen.

damn, you're cute ... I almost came looking at your pics!

seen that one before but it's always a good read :)

I enjoyed it very much. It is a good one

Good one, time4! Now I understand why the inner-most circle of hell in Dante's Inferno is ice, not fire. And given how perilous a journey our souls must make after death, I can now understand why some guy (true story) was selling his soul on E-bay! lol!

OMG, what is my ex-wife doing here? :O

Got it from one of my friends on 360. Boycott Japanese hosts.

Tuna anyone?

are chat hosts on here moonlighting as dolphin harvesters? how does boycotting japanese hosts on here help?

n/a

basically it's called respect.

I agree with you paco

Bambi, "Every guy?" I agree there are guys that are suck-ups, but let's consider only the present case below (which I gather prompted your post?) I can't speak for others, but I defended Charlotte based on an assumption (which admittedly could be erroneous, since I do not have experience with her in Chat) that what she reports is a fairly accurate account of her experience. I am not among those "sensitive" types who think they will gain something by currying favor with the women here. I agree, Paco, respect is important, but that is a different thing than sucking up to someone to gain some advantage.

Anyone who believes the offending parties here are always the viewers is looking through rose colored glasses indeed! There are plenty of hosts who behave badly as well.

We will only defend against unwarranted attacks and blatant lies. Some will defend more than others and there are always some who will see the best in everyone.

Was an example here of a member who was so nauseatingly oily and gushing with hosts - he turned out to be a real control freak in real life, seriously wierd man. Nevertheless, paco is right, no need for us members to be rude to hosts. Between ourselves, yeah let's occasionally give each other a bad time just to vent some of our frustrations! ;-)

By saying"defending hosts"you give the impression that they are being attacked.now what good person wouldn't help a friend under attack!?If the posts are what the postee truly believes it can't be"sucking up".So who is to decide if what is posted is a belief or"sucking up"? just because a post doesn't agree with your point of view doesn't mean it's"sucking up".

It all comes down to manners.
Something that seems lacking
so much today!
Also common sense!
Chathosts have no idea when they
are getting viewers!
So when they are waiting for viewers
they are doing other things.
Important things like studying!

I`m with you on this Charlotte:)
not only just saying a long hello....they also wank in text chat...if they do get pissed off ( coz u r tired of chatting for hours)...who cares??? its obviously they have no intention to come in video , since they cum* in text chat...so...(uzi)!....Good Luck to you Charlotte (K)

n/a

cheer up Charlotte:) (K) if u cant (uzi) the guys....(uzi) the bad mood then:)
and btw...I must be a real bitch =))) since I enjoy (uzi) them:D( the ones who deserve it ofc;))
who cares tho??? since Im happy:D....
have a great time Charlotte(K)

n/a

n/a

cool-good luck girls and best wishes and I dont blame you and if i was a host i would say the same thing what you are saying-so stay cool

n/a

n/a

sounds like good advice, have you tried telling this to the guys that actually do this to you?

n/a

n/a

n/a

Hi Charlotte
Hope you enjoyed our short chat ? I think we may have the makings of a beautiful friendship. Your my kind of girl, sassy...smart... pretty...and intelligent. By the way, my name is Alan.

n/a

Simple solution, don't come online! You're a sitting duck for these losers

n/a

n/a

since i cant view your bits, can i see tits...hehe
Gald your feeling better

n/a

Charlottle, You have a legitimate complaint. I'm sure, as Kate pointed out above, there are some guys that never intend to enter Live, but who want to pretend they will. I suspect it's an ego thing. These guys think they will be able to charm you and get something for nothing. (Btw, you mention their requests to show your tits in Free. But isn't that Text? There is only a photo in my Text Chat. Are there different systems? Just curious.)

I would simply advise you to cut these guys off after their intentions are made clear. Don't hope against hope. You might institute a personal policy that you state upfront. After the usual courtesies are exchanged, make it a policy that they must decide. They must "fish or cut bait," as we say in English. Tell them courteously but directly that you are here to earn a living and must limit the time you spend in Text. After some reasonable time (5 minutes?), politely suggest that if they want to think about it they can come back, but you cannot afford to continue with them in Text. If they respond with abusive language, then they are showing their true intentions. Such types should be reported to CC and you should "block" them. (Hosts have the option to "block" a viewer, right?)

P.S. Charlotte, I see I did not remember what you had written re: showing your tits. You were making the adult/non-adult distinction and I was thinking you had said Free text vs. Live. I've got it now :)

Thanks for replying Melomane :)

The fact is that I don't like to block guys and I don't want to do it either.
The guys that ate today 6 hours of my time in free (yes I do keep a strict accounting :P ) are guys that usualy come and see me, but I don't know why today they thought I have time to waiste :( That is why I was pissed off, because they know way too well about me and what am I doing here :(

I wanted to say more but I am tired so I forgot what I wanted to say :)))
Have a nice evening (K)

Why on earth would you let a member stay in text chat for 6 hours? then complaing about it. You can't have it both ways hun, if you keep the text conversation going hour after hour you can't come here and complain. It takes two to keep a conversation going, next time set a time limit (10min?) if he isn't going in vid by then, tell him you have other stuff you must take care of.

Ohh dear! I was talking on plural, I said the GUYS not guy! They came one after another... onewas for 30-40 minutes, then before he left another one came for about an hour, then the first one came back and so on for 6 hours...

Why can't you people pay attention to what you read???

wow, you're crabby today.
So members can sit and text chat with you for up to an hour? I guess if you let them they will keep doing it.

I talk a lot sometimes with host, but I do understand, and hope every member here does too, that this is a bussiness,most host here are here for the money. When I'm talking in free chat or commchat in pvt, I hope the host has enough sense to tell me she has to go because of a vid or sorry you are here too long, and I can respect that. I do not ask for free vids or most of the time I don't go to free vids because this is a business and there is nothing wrong with that.
I don’t usually go to vid in nonadult because I like to see beautiful nude women so I don’t go to nonadult and bother the host with any request to go nude.

I wish both members and host had more respect for each other, true host are not machines and members are not just the size of their credit cards.

"host are not machines and members are not just the size of their credit cards." - soooo true!! And I always try to keep this in everybody's mind :D

HERE HERE

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Charlotte.....after all we talked here..I got a guy that stayed 1&1/2 hr in text chat=)).....plus...he reproached that I stay in comm chat /:)...(uzi)(UZI)(uzi)!!!!!!!!!!

n/a

n/a

Hi Charlotte

I am sorry you have such bad experiences with some members.
I have been a member here since 2003 and have used text chat very little. Excep with special host I built up relationship with over time.
I beleive it should be made clear by CC that text chat is for short chat only and there shuld be a way for a host to Iggy members that presist when the host is busy or occupied.

While we all find friends, or preceived friends here, this is a business for host. Text chat is a privilidge for us, not a god given right. No member should demand free text chat anbe obnixous when it is not readily given,

I agree that taxt chat is for shorter times of visiting. I am one that tries to keep it short, but sometimes I might lose track of time like I do in video. Just tell me bye and that you will talk to me another time. Do not hesitate to tell members like me bye!!

n/a

n/a

n/a

A good clue to find out if the textchatter is an ass or thinks he helps you fill time:

After five minutes or so of chat, just say something like "Hey, it was great of you to stop by, I have to go work on a project now" or "I think I may have a show in a couple minutes, I better get ready. Bye for now."

n/a

You obviously have enough time on your hands to answer these forum posts. Don't bite the hand that feeds you...

Well if you would've paid a little bit of attention, you would've noticed that I am not online when I post here and the hours when I give replyes are different.
And for your own enlightment I can talk on free text chat and post in forums in the same time as well as I can do the things I have to do in the house and take a 5 minutes break to post here too ;)
I never bite the hand that feeds me. But you forget that I give something back to that hand too. It is called paying for a service, not having the right to abuse someones kindness ;)
Have fun :)

You are too kind, Charlotte... :) :) :)

n/a

Customer is always right

n/a

Very good advice Karin!
We all have to learn, to not let anyone walk over us! :)

unless were getting a Japanese foot massage! :D

Scumpa, I textchat a lot and if a host gives me the hint I go. If she doesn't, I think I am helping her kill boredom. I'll talk for hours if you want and I have the time. Or I'll leave right away if you are busy.

n/a

n/a

n/a

Your gonna get at least 20 spam mails a day now.

wow,, your right,, someone tell me how to get this stuff off,,, this is why yahoo sucks--not cool

n/a

Yahoo has a great filter. It kept over 800 spams away from me in the last week.

I get maybe one or two a day and press the "spam" button and I never hear from them again.

all I know is their gum taste like rubber...blecchh

the Durex little gem is truly orgasmic xx rechargeable 2 !

n/a

Mayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyybe! :p

whitch misfortunate host are you visiting now ???.... note to host on his return you will be ignored

haha... and which misfortunate host did I ignore? :)

Cya

watch out for the door.....

n/a

or bang ur head!

the big head or the little head?

Well if u trip, u cud potentially hurt them both...

sure u gone now?

bye austin--good luck and stay cool

bye AP
dont get caught ;)

see ya soon with new nickname ;)

This is what? the 10th time you quit?

freedom of speach....means i can say fuck and no one takes it the wrong way,,,, i can say sex,, and people should take it in a way,, i can say hello all the times, i can say goodbye when someone hurts someone,,, i can say jerk off,, when someone is telling me to get a life,,, i can say, wtf is it with you why i am here wheni want too and i can say i am kidding from some things and i can say okie dokie whenever i want to,, so pissed off--haha

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Sean ,i think u need a grt fck all the time and i admire u for who u r and congrats that u r so potent(LOL)ppl must be taked as they r(K)
sooooooooooooooo good answer u had here :P:P:P(okie)

n/a

means you can ask any stoopid question you want and I can reply anyway I want.

n/a

Galaxy, I think you missed ykw's biting irony.

it means anything i say can and will be use against me in the court of law.

Freedom of speech is smth that always got me into troubles=)).ha! I enjoy it though :D so f*** U all=)) (K)

That wud…,

First off, let me congratulate you for raising the bar by asking a more substantial question than you had been posting in your “Can you” series. Some of your critics were perhaps a bit harsh, but I think you would admit that you set yourself up for it by asking the most mundane questions (e.g. “Can you salsa dance?...Can you cook?...etc”) Questions can still be simple without being mundane. Your present question is a case in point: simple but substantial.

Freedom of Speech is one of the fundamental freedoms in a truly democratic society. One of America’s most famous Founding Fathers, Thomas Jefferson, understood this and was so firm in his conviction that he would not ratify (sign) the US Constitution unless the delegates agreed to amend the document with what is called the Bill of Rights. The Delegates to the Constitutional Convention already had sufficient votes to create the Constitution, but Jefferson (and the Virginia colony) was among the most powerful voices in the new nation and the delegates knew that the new Government could not succeed without Jefferson’s blessing. They therefore agreed to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. The Bill became the first ten amendments to the Constitution and it grants, among other things, the guarantee of freedom of speech & press, freedom of assembly and freedom of religion. US History would look much different in the absence of these guarantees. Even with these guarantees many individual citizens and groups have struggled against those—including Government officials past and present (yes, Bush et al. right now!)---who would deny them what the Constitution guarantees them.

Those whom the people elect to represent them in Government have a sworn Constitutional duty to uphold the freedoms it guarantees. However, if the people are not ever vigilant, those in power will abuse these freedoms. As brilliant as the US system of “checks and balances” is, it cannot prevent abuses if the citizens are ignorant or asleep. Jefferson put forth certain maxims, among which was, “A people cannot be both ignorant and free.” What is particularly dangerous in the US is the fact that the mainstream news media are increasingly a part of the problem because they do not report the real abuses of freedoms by the government-sponsored commercial/mass media/ entertainment conglomerates. And if there is genuine Freedom of the Press, why don’t they report this? Because they are among the co-conspirators! Without going through a litany of examples, let me offer just one: Media mogul and right wing ideologue, Ruppert Murdoch (owner of Fox News, media of every type around the globe). Americans watch Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’ Reilly and think they are “informed.” They mistake propaganda for news. Rather than thinking for themselves, they are told what to think. They are the unwitting dupes of what Noam Chomsky calls “manufactured consent.”

By way of qualification, Freedom of Speech should not be confused with a license for bad manners or grossly irresponsible behavior. As a Supreme Court Justice (I believe it was Holmes) remarked in a case testing Freedom of Speech, “Freedom of Speech does not give a man the right to yell, ‘Fire’ in a crowded theatre.” For this reason I disagree with almost everything Austin P said above about freedom of speech. For example, he says, “I can say fuck and no one takes it the wrong way.” Nonsense! I agree, uttering the word may not result in arrest as a result of this Freedom, but the Freedom does not guarantee that if you insult someone, they will not “take it the wrong way.” To the point, Freedom of Speech is legislated; civility is governed by unwritten custom and as a general rule means treating your fellow man as you would like to be treated.

n/a

So you read my posts if they are short and leave if they are long? (I guess you're not a big fan of long Russian novels, huh? lol!) It's not entirely your fault. A short attention span is the condition of the age----even a psychiatric diagnosis: ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder). So, I'll try to be brief and offer a carrot to keep your attention.

BRITTANY SPEARS FLASHES BUSH...NOT THE PRESIDENT....STAY TUNED FOR THIS EXCLUSIVE CC REPORT. BUT FIRST TWO QUOTES FROM "BORING" FRENCHMAN FROM THE 17TH CENTURY, FRANCOIS duc de LA ROCHEFOUCAULD

1) "We are invariably bored by those to whom we are boring."

2) "We are almost always bored by the very people by whom it is vital not to be bored."

I am sure La Rochefoucauld is right because: re: #1, I find you boring as well, though I would have kept it to myself had you not brought it up; and re: #2) I would be willing to bet you have never given much thought to "That wud's" question and that you would find Thomas Jefferson "boring." I challenge you to answer the question and prove me wrong.....BUT BACK TO THIS EXCLUSIVE CC REPORT ABOUT BRITTANY'S BUSH.

melomane you have an inflated opinion of yourself(see your quote #2)& are a pompous windbag.

Here we go again. So, you are OMG today, not Novids4me? Re: # 2, I was referencing Thomas Jefferson, not myself.

not only a windbag but one with a fixation.i aint this novids dude you are refer to.LMAO im one of those who hate that sycophant.

Nahh, not a fixation guy. It's simply that you have so much in common with him: same vocabulary; same writing habits; same arrogant presumption as self-appointed judge; same habit of using the forum to personally attack another member; same habit of not making a contribution to the discussion. No wonder you hate him. He reminds you of yourself.

yep you are fixated.to make so many judgements about a name you know nothing about shows that.he has got under your skin to.

I think OMG was referring to the La Rochefoucauld quote you used when he/she referred to #2 rather than the Thomas Jefferson one.As you say you agree with it it could be interpretted that what you are saying is that you feel it applies to your posts.I understand that may not have been what you meant.

Your point is well taken. The first quote is unambiguous in how it applies here. Alias finds me boring; I find him boring. However, I should have qualified # 2. But even had I done so, OMG would have found some other reason to attack me personally. It's par for the course with self-appointed judges like him.

I was by no means suggesting it is "vital" for "alias" to pay heed to what I say, but I do maintain none of us---as members of a thoughtful citizenry---can afford to ignore thinkers like Thomas Jefferson. I don't say Jefferson is indispensible, but as a class, kindred thinkers from the past have lessons that we can ill-afford to ignore.

you also made judgments about OMG melomane.some of which appear to be wrong

n/a

I agree with most of what you say but I do disagree with your perception of the media. The “main line press” is reporting only thing that fit their agenda and if they can’t find a story to substantiate their view they have a tendency to make things up. You can not believe 100% of what either side says in the news; the truth is some where in the middle of both views and you having to sift through the entire BS to find it.
The FREEDOM OF SPEECH, I feel that it is a God given right but you also have the RESONPSIBILITY when you use that freedom. Most people in the USA miss use this right, like protesting the military’s policies of gays at the funeral of a fallen soldier , yes you have the right but not the proper place to protest.

Slutpuppy,

The US Declaration of Independence reflects your view that Freedom of Speech is a God-given right. We are, in the language of the Declaration, endowed with certain "unalienable" rights, among which are "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." However, we must allow that atheists love liberty no less than theists.

I agree that these Freedoms should be used responsibly. There is such a thing as righteous anger and protest re: injustice, but one's moral position in such cases is best legitimated by expressing it in the right measure, at the right time and in the right place. And that does not always mean one should work WITHIN the system. If the "system" is the problem, there will be no allowance for the "right" time or place. That is where civil disobedience comes in. If you've not already read it, read Martin Luther King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail."

I would like to respond to your comment re: my view of the media. But first, I would like to ask you to clarify two points you made by answering the following:

1) What, in your view, is the media’s “agenda?”

2) You speak of the “two sides” and claim the truth lies in the middle. What are the
Two sides?

1) to sell their"brand" & foster"brand"loyalty.
2) Liberal & liberal

I agree with your answer to #1, but it is only a part---albeit a major one---of the larger agenda. Clearly one of the principal aims of news organizations (print, TV, radio) is to earn a profit. Hard news is expensive to produce and its commercial appeal is limited. This is one of several reasons for news being buffered and repackaged with the unmistakable garb of feel-good entertainment. One need only look at the appointment of Katie Couric to replace Dan Rather on CBS!

All the major commercial television networks are owned by huge media/entertainment conglomerates. These conglomerates also own newspapers, magazines, book publishers, cable and satellite TV companies, radio stations, bookstores, Internet Service Providers, film studios, movie theatre chains, etc. The six largest are: 1) AOL Time Warner, 2) Disney, 3) Bertelsmann, 4) Viacom 5) News Corporation, 6) Vivendi Universal. Together they have revenues exceeding $100 billion per year. That buys a lot of influence in Washington. Two examples will suffice: Sen. John McCain sponsored legislation that changed US rules concerning media ownership, which allowed Viacom to buy CBS. Years before Congress changed the laws on behalf of Australian born Rupert Murdoch which allowed him to acquire certain US media outlets. Murdoch’s News Corporation is Fox TV’s parent company.

So, the larger agenda includes politics and ideology. These corporations have essentially bought the Government and they will brook no dissent from their commercial/political/ideological agenda.

I see you have bought into the conservative mantra that the media are liberal. Truth is, the media are status quo and largely centrist. The fact is there is no mainstream media voice in the US that is Left. Slightly left of center is about as far as it goes here (e.g. Washington Post). France has Liberation. UK has the Guardian, but there is no mainstream US newspaper that is genuinely Left. We do, however, have Right-wing newspapers (e.g. The Rev. Moon’s “Washington Times” and Rupert Murdoch’s “New York Post,” to name but two.)

If you control the media, you control public opinion. Commercial News organizations and the Government work overtime to tell people what to think. The frightening thing is that a significant majority of the American public believe the manufactured opinions are their own! The public does not get the truth from our media. It gets bromides, soporifics and maudlin tales of another movie star who has contracted a disease. And while the people are fast asleep, the tyrants exact their agenda. God help us!

nope you got it wrong.i said the media is Liberal & liberal,not liberal.a very big difference.

Okay, so you mean Liberal (in the traditional sense of the word) and "liberal", as in what is called "neoliberalism," i.e. arch-conservatism (and laissez faire Capitalism) ?

i meant Liberal=conservative right wingers(call them what you want)& liberal=tree-huggers,bleeding hearts,left wingers(call them what you want)

Thanks for clarifying. Truth is, the terms Liberal & Conservative have lost their original (and best) meaning.

The U.S. Constitutional right of Freedom of Speech is often confused and thought to be a license to say what you want where you want and how you want and you are absolutely protected.

The U.S. Constitution simply warrants that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Note that that means Camcontacts can do whatevrr it wants with the forums because Congress does not control the forums.

For a view of Freedom of Speech around the world go here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech

Patriot, You are right, of course, about how people often misunderstand what the Constitution provides. As I said above, I believe it was Justice Holmes who said Freedom of Speech "does not give a man a right to yell 'fire' in a crowded theatre."

I'm sure you are not surprised by this. It is frightening how little many Americans know about how the Government works. Ignorance makes a people ripe for having their liberties abused. As Jefferson said, "A people cannot be both ignorant and free."

Another thing many people confuse is thinking that the Government is the Nation. The Government consists of the elected officials, appointed officials and civil servants working for the various branches of Government. The people are entitled, indeed have the duty to watch the Government and ciriticize those who have failed to do the duty that they are sworn to uphold, and it is bogus nonsense to accuse those who criticize elected officials, of a lack of patriotism. It seems to me, a true patriot is one who keeps vigil to preserve our liberties. A failure to do so is an open invitation to tyranny. And history has shown that "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrannts."

no austin--thats what you get for thinking,,, she loves me more

im dont love ur

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

another one bite the dust. I see even the most hardened ones get taken for a ride sometimes. Don;t let the little head do the thinking for the big head.

why?

n/a

n/a

hurt luv is never funny--but u hear it here so often--more often then not--no one ever bothers to name the offeneders--maybe they do same to others--cool-peace out all

why should you name the offenders,, so you can hackle them--come on,, leave it along and find your heart broken one day and lets see how you feel funny

hey im back now--i had to go and be a best man at her wedding--okie dokie

hey im not heart broken i made that story up to make this chick here feel better, so im back and alive, by the way only time i was heart broken was when i lost my 2nd grade girlfriend-okie dokie

i dont think it is funny at all!!!!
if my wife found out i was seeing a married stripper she whould be angry
i dont wear a wedding band for 3 reasons..
1. hate my wife
2. i get hit on or flirted with by more when i wore it.
3. i dont like wearing jewelry

but remember son, girls like wearing them, because they are pretty not for the symbol it represents to the opposite sex.

hahaha john u r always my best good mood maker(K)(K)(K)lo

single , married, bf, who cares? As long as I get my needs taken care of. if you are in amrriage category I understand your point, but in all the others categories I'm there for short term fun.

n/a

I'm from the US and never knew that this was opposite from us in Eastern Europe and Russia. But now I'm curious what else is different :) Is an engagement ring (usually a solitary diamond ring worth about 3 to 6 months of a man's salary) an important part of your engagement process? Is it inappropriate there for a man to propose to a lady without an engagement ring? And do you use an additional wedding ring (usually a plain gold band worn on the same finger as the engagement ring) during your wedding ceremony?

n/a

n/a

I have a ring on my left hand but its not a wedding ring lol) Even doesn't look like it(LOL)

n/a

n/a

n/a

the best u ever tooked (LOL)and decent one u r in non adult by the way:D
ah try to have ur ordinary mood and be urself dont fake in pics;)

n/a

wo, alex good song,, nice mood,, how can I come in and dance with you

okie dokie sean i cant dance on that song but maybe smt else..who knows........:P:P:P;)

Great song Fade to black, little depressive (lyrics) but great, one of my fav with no doubt, but best for me is Iron Maiden - Hallowed Be Thy Name, not exactly cc topic all that but im glad some metal heads are here too :-):-) Keep rockin!!!

wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww grt that we met(K)(K)(K)

cool

sweet song! i'm a metal head too.EDDIE RULES!

n/a

if it was just on appearance it would only be a physical attraction so it could not be serious,i think.

n/a

n/a

I would certainly enter a relationship based on looks but if that's all there was it would soon fizzle out.

n/a

n/a

Anyone who thinks that most relationships dont begin with initial physical attraction is fooling themselves. It is a rare person who overlooks the physical and goes for something deeper. At least initially.

her looks? no she has to have other qualities and attributes, such as the ability to calm me down, be smart and strength of both mind an body.

Isn't that how most relations start out? You have to find something physically attractive about your future bf/gf. Then you can get into the emotional/intelligence aspects.

there's no such thing as a serious romantic relationship that doesn't begin with physical attraction.

n/a

Whatevaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa`

disagree from personal experience - fell in love with a woman who'd been in a fire - looked awful but 10 minutes after talking to her, I forgot about the scars

that's called the Florence Nightengale effect.

she wasn't my nurse - lol - and it wasn't out of pity, it was sex appeal

No.

A person may enter a relationship on good looks, but for it to enter the serious stage more then good looks must exist.

Curious, I agree with you. I have had that happen to me also. However, sometimes they come online very soon after that .

n/a

maybe ther make themselves apear offline to the general public to keep the guys that want to sit in their texxt chat room for hours away.

I would guess there are two servers involved. One runs the comm chat and the other runs the full video site. I have been on comm chat and the full site has gone down. You can continue to chat away. The chat server seems more stable.

dont know they are offline. i have encountered that a few times and she claims to be unaware that she offline

n/a

Thanks for all your replies they made sense.I never said all and I did say presumably.I was meaning the hosts who send pvy messages to members thay have never chatted to and where that member very rarely chats in public.I base that assumption on my experience in comm chat.You complained the last time I posted and that was when I was being helpful to you.

n/a

Sometimes it's a glitch in the software.

n/a

I think I have you blocked.

Good to know:)

the only block i want with KATE is a block on our bedroom door when we are together!!!

zzzzzzzzzzzz

me,it seems your answer is a resounding no!(hahaha)

had enough practice at defeat but still learning the gracious part.

yes...can u?

I'm never gracious to dese feet, they smell too bad!

n/a

yes

n/a

So far, I have been gracious in losing my love to another guy on cc. It's a bit easier when I don't have to see them at the market or nightclubs all the time. I think if we went to the same church or worked in the same company it would be unbearable.

I would have thought that it was pretty much impossible unless you were only wearing something like panties and bra.But even then still very very difficult.

I think that it would be impossible. It is very strange request

espically strange if you are wearing eatible underwear.

Unless you were naked to begin with. I have visited a few adult hosts who were in the all together when I entered the video. Not sure if they were undressed from a prior video or if they liked being nude. Maybe it was just hot where they were. In either case it was not as sexy as you might think. Give me lingerie any day. For starters.

n/a

I guess he means without your fingers? He wants to see you perform. You are a performer. He knows it's difficult. Try it on the cam.

If it's really impossible tell him to come back after you can find different clothes that make it more possible.

NO HANDS? Can I use my teeth to get u naked or is that against the rules also? : ) just kidding.. whoever asked you to do that on cam was just another weirdo.

n/a

sorry sorry

n/a

n/a

That lil Reggie grew up a bit of all right.

Is he really still alive?

I like it when its a lil hairy..Not much tho:)) I like it groomed:)

n/a

n/a

n/a

Polina, you want a ladyboy?!!!!!

n/a

n/a

dont mind a bit on the chest, unless you got man boobs, eek now that is freaky

olivia, divine creature, where are you? missed you!

now here is a very interesting question,,, can I ask you,, do you like men with hair on their legs---cool

n/a

you calling me a monkey?, Anne.. hehe..kiss

lol don....stay cool;)

This old guy does not have a chance

oh,Riv, dont be so hard with urself i still want to fish in that water;)lol

You are invited to fish in my water

n/a

How can there be a "right answer"? Some people like it, some don't.

I love it, thanks Psy. I always found poorly translated maps and manuals fun. I remember the manual for my 486 motherboard from Taiwan instead of having the fairly common "burst line refresh" had a much more interesting "bust line refresh" maybe it was a mother board for mature hosts that tend to droop a little much. I also saw a japanese map translated to english showing a water purification plant as a "Water Punishment Plant" I think it's engineer frequents the dungeon category.

hey now--lets not compared dungeons to road maps--not cool

You're correct, dungeons wouldn't be on road maps -- they're at secret locations.

Lol :))

Thank god, never had to talk to such a person.. Even if I'm a patient person, not even when I began working on CC, I had some non-english guests and even members.. It was a total pain in the ass to talk to them and I kinda gave up.. I know I should have been nicer than that, but it was hard enough for me to make myself understood.

Funny, I just started read A year in the merde, written by an English guy that spent a year in France...

n/a